Consider it the "carrot" way to deal with a solid eating routine, instead of the "stick" approach—the length of you like carrots. New research in the diary Psychology and Marketing finds that individuals who concentrate on eating solid sustenances they really like (mmm avocados and jab dishes!) are more effective at patching up their eating designs than individuals who focus on the wretchedness of maintaining a strategic distance from unfortunate dishes they worship (sign bacon yearnings and rough street wanders off in fantasy land).
"Concentrating on what you can have, and can do, and ought to have a greater amount of is a superior system," says co-creator Kelly Haws, PhD, a partner educator of promoting at Vanderbilt University's Owen Graduate School of Management in Nashville. Nourishment records and exhortation surrounded in supreme terms ("never eat chocolate") can be a formula for disappointment, she includes.
It's an inclination others in the sustenance field offer. "Nourishment records are not powerful," concurs Lauri Wright, PhD, RDN, a representative for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. "Individuals may take a gander at those rundowns and think, 'Those are my most loved nourishments that you're stating don't [eat] so I'm not going to try and attempt.' Or they attempt, then eat something [unhealthy], then beat themselves up. The all the more a division we set up, the more a feeling of disappointment, then the more individuals stop the arrangement."
The scientists took a shot at the supposition that individuals with high "discretion" settle on preferable decisions over individuals with low poise. In this connection, restraint implies how rash you are, and that you are so ready to defer prompt satisfaction for future objectives.
The study comprised of two separate trials. In the initial, 176 students were isolated into two gatherings. People in one gathering made a rundown of nourishments they believed were useful for slimming down. The other recorded nourishments that they considered terrible for consuming less calories. They then evaluated the amount they loved every thing in their rundowns. Specialists additionally measured where every member fell on an acknowledged size of restraint.
As anticipated, individuals with more prominent discretion will probably list nourishments they loved in their solid sustenances section, and sustenances they didn't generally like at any rate wound up in the "stay away from" classification. Individuals with low restraint were the inverse: More prone to rundown sustenances they delighted in the "don't eat" section, and more inclined to rundown nourishments they didn't appreciate in their "do eat" segment.
The second study, which included 200 students, affirmed these discoveries and included a second element: Participants were given a rundown of 16 nibble things, some solid and some not, then requested that rundown their main five decisions. Individuals who had concentrated on maintaining a strategic distance from sustenances they enjoyed had a tendency to pick the less sound snacks. In the mean time individuals who had concentrated on eating solid nourishments they loved picked more advantageous snacks.
It's practically as if individuals who seem to be "great" at restraint actually set themselves up to succeed: Think of it as the Power of Positive Thinking, sustenance style. "We are more fruitful at adhering to our good dieting arranges when we consider sound sustenances being alluring and energizing than when we harp on keeping away from undesirable nourishments," says Pam Koch, RD, official executive of the Laurie M. Tisch Center for Food, Education and Policy at Teachers College Columbia University in New York City. "Considering 'Yes, I can' gets us more distant than considering, 'I better not.'"
What's more, a sound eating regimen doesn't need to be one-size-fits-all arrangement. Truth be told, the more custom-made your eating routine is to your own sense of taste, the better: "Individualizing an eating routine example and way of life decisions helps people settle on those more beneficial decisions," says Wright, who is likewise aide teacher of nourishment at the University of South Florida College of Public Health in Tampa. "You can in any case have a nutritiously sound eating routine yet [include] nourishments that are adequate and taste great to that person."
Powered by : health
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar